The Dream Girls Intro Web Page!
#1 In The World Dream Girls!
You & The World Are In This Reality Show!
*We Are Creating A New Era In Communications*
*Connecting EveryBody In The World Thru One WebSite!*
Tell All Of Your Friends To Join US On This WebSite!
Click The Link Below:
*Talk To Your Friends, & Family On Their Cell Phone While You Watch Them On Live WebCams Anywhere In The World!*Your Cell Phone Connection To The World!
Click Here For The Dream Girls WebCams, Viral Videos Communities, Virtual World & Free Online Satellite TV!
Click here to make DreamGirls your default homepage
Get TheDreamgirlsAdventure chat group | Goto TheDreamgirlsAdventure website
Click Here For The Dream Girls WebCams, Viral Videos Communities, Virtual World & Free Online Satellite TV!
Click here to make DreamGirls your default homepage
Get TheDreamgirlsAdventure chat group | Goto TheDreamgirlsAdventure website
TheDreamGirlsAdventure.Com
Connecting Every WebCam In The World!
EVERYBODY IN THE WORLD IS
IN OUR REALITY SHOW BECAUSE
THE WORLD IS OUR STAGE!*
posted by The Dream Girls Adventure at 6:04 PM
8 Comments:
Click Here For Girls From All Over The World Video Clips!
8. Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Respondent has requested a finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (“RDNH”), which is defined in the Rules as “using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name.” The Panel finds that Complainant in this proceeding has committed RDNH.
As noted above, where the Domain Name was registered prior to the establishment of trademark rights, bad faith registration usually will not be found and the Complaint usually will fail. That principle is so well established that it is among the twenty issues covered in the WIPO Decision Overview for which a consensus has been identified. When a Complainant files a UDRP Complaint that fails to heed this consensus, RDNH has been found. Primal Quest, LLC v. Gabriel Salas, WIPO Case No. D2005-1083.
In this proceeding, Complainant is represented by counsel who cited numerous UDRP decisions in support of the Complaint. This shows that, at a minimum, Complainant’s counsel is familiar with the UDRP system and with the methods of researching prior UDRP decisions. From an objective view of the facts, Complainant, employing experienced counsel, had to have known that it did not possess trademark rights prior to Respondent’s registration of the contested Domain Name.
Finally, Complainant’s long delay in bringing this action is another factor supporting a finding of its bad faith. Although laches does not necessarily bar relief in cases of genuine cybersquatting, the fact that Complainant filed this proceeding nearly ten years after the Domain Name was registered, six years after Respondent first became a distributor of Complainant’s videos, and more than two years after Complainant acknowledged to customers that it was aware of Respondent,3 all suggests that Complainant knew it had a very weak claim and nevertheless filed its UDRP Complaint in bad faith.
The Panel accordingly finds that Complainant’s actions constitute an abuse of the UDRP process.
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Dreamgirls, Inc., Tampa, Florida, United States of America, represented by Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
The Respondent is Dreamgirls Entertainment, Brea, California, United States of America, represented by Joel G. MacMull, Esq., Vancouver, Canada.
7. Discussion and Findings
Complainant has the burden of proving all three of the following elements under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy:
(i) That the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights;
(ii) That Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) That the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Failure to prove any one of these factors is fatal to the Complaint.
Bad faith registration cannot be found if the Domain Name was registered before Complainant acquired trademark rights. The consensus view of WIPO panelists, as reported in the WIPO Decision Overview, is that “when a domain name is registered before a trademark right is established, the registration of the domain name was not in bad faith because the registrant could not have contemplated the complainant’s non-existent right.” WIPO Decision Overview at § 3.1.2
Here, there is no dispute about the relevant chronology. Although Complainant states that it produced its first video under the DREAMGIRLS mark in 1994, it does not allege any distribution of that video or any other use in commerce of the DREAMGIRLS mark circa 1994. Rather, as Complainant’s predecessor noted in its trademark registration, and as Complainant’s CFO acknowledged in his declaration, the first use and first use in commerce of the DREAMGIRLS mark was on February 15, 1996. Respondent, however, registered the Domain Name more than four months earlier, in October 1995. In light of these uncontroverted facts, it is clear that Respondent did not register the Domain Name in bad faith with the intent of profiting from any goodwill inherent in Complainant’s trademark or interfering with Complainant’s use of its mark. Primal Quest, LLC v. Gabriel Salas, WIPO Case No. D2005-1083.
Even if Complainant’s activities in 1994 could give rise to trademark rights, the Panel still would conclude that Complainant has failed to prove bad faith registration because Respondent’s President submitted a sworn affidavit asserting that he had no knowledge of Complainant or its trademark at the time he registered the Domain Name. Although not every assertion of lack of knowledge is credible (see, e.g., The Knot v. In Knot We Trust LTD, WIPO Case No. D2006-0340 (respondent’s assertion that it had no knowledge of complainant or its trademark was not credible because respondent used its domain name for a wedding-related website and complainant operated a highly-successful, well-known wedding website)), Respondent’s assertion in this proceeding is credible given that Complainant made only limited use (if any) of the trademark in 1994, that Complainant’s predecessor did not file its trademark application until nearly two years after Respondent registered the Domain Name, and that Complainant has not offered any evidence that Respondent was aware of Complainant’s trademark at the time of it registered the Domain Name.
Because the Panel finds that Complainant did not establish the third element necessary to succeed in its Complaint (bad faith registration and use), the Panel does not need to address the other factors under the Policy.
9. Decision
For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied and the Panel declares that the Complaint was brought in bad faith and thus constitutes Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
David H. Bernstein
Presiding Panelist
Jonathan Hudis
Panelist
M. Scott Donahey
Panelist
Dated: August 10, 2006
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dreamgirls, Inc. v. Dreamgirls Entertainment
Case No. D2006-0609
Wow :) Nice & entertaining post. Thanks for Share this wonderful post. :)
Dream Girls Marketing–Twitter
“They are the beauties of the world”
The Purpose of Twitter:
Twitter is a system of social networking that allows individuals to “follow” their interests. Peer interest is significant amongst friends, as well as celebrity interest among fans. The Dream Girls project having a twitter is essential due to the glamour girls desire to include audience participation. The virtual world is the world that the Dream Girls will be portraying, so the project is a social network in itself. The key elements of the show are the “glamour girl’s” progression of acting, singing, dancing, and modeling. Beneath those key elements are the images that the Dream Girls are going to be directing to the audience. Imagery of glamour and beauty are indeed shown from the Dream Girl’s sexy appearance. While the outer beauty is significant for the girls of glamour’s career, the inner beauty is taken into consideration as well. This project is also meant to evaluate the girl’s inner beauty and strength.
The Dream Girls Twitter
The Dream Girls are indefinitely the glamour girls of the world. With that said, the twitter should give the fans just that perception. Images of “fine line” jewels should be present on the twitter page to let the audience know these girls are as rare as a diamond. These jewels will also reveal the high class society of which the girls will be present in.
The Dream Girls are going to be traveling all over the world, revealing exotic places to the audience. The average individual does not get to travel to such areas around the world and will be intrigued by the scenes the project will display. Thus, Twitter should have elements bringing about a visual to the audience of just how beautiful the world is.
The Entertainment Industry Is meant to catch the attention of the audience. This attention is purposely brought upon them to “entertain” them. People love to be entertained by beauty that astounds them. Sex appeal is key here, and the secret to success is the way you present the sex appeal. The sex appeal is meant to be distributed through a “lens”, per se, of fanciness and glamour. I picture a Dream Girl in black laced lingerie and diamonds, wearing red lipstick and displaying so much beauty that to look at her will cause you to feel emotion.
Sex appeal is a part of the act of entertainment, and so is talent. The Dream Girls are more beautiful than any woman imagined, and they are also intelligent in what they do. The girls have the talents of a princess; they sing, dance, model, and act using their high achievements and knowledge that is above an average girl. The talents that they posses are one of a goddess; men desire these girls and women want to be them. They are
Post a Comment
<< Home